
P. Llamas Ruiz vs P. Nesterov2 - 1
Llamas Ruiz favoured, but Nesterov’s Villena form warrants caution
Our pick
odds are estimates- Medium confidenceWonMatch WinnerP. Llamas Ruiz to win@ 1.40
Selections are named as on a bookmaker's slip, so they are easy to find. Add one to your ticket to keep it with the rest of your picks and see how it settles.
Full analysis
Llamas Ruiz is ranked 144 with 397 points, compared with Nesterov’s ranking of 298 and 187 points. His available price of 1.36, implying roughly a 74% chance, closely matches the six-bookmaker average of 1.34 and supports him as the favourite.
Llamas Ruiz beat L. Nardi 2–0 in Villena on 5 October, following mixed results that included a 2–1 win over K. Coppejans and a 2–1 loss to R. Brancaccio in Seville. Nesterov has won three consecutive matches in Villena, beating C. Chen and H. Barton 2–1 before defeating C. Hernandez 2–0, so his current form offers a credible challenge.
Medium confidence reflects the agreement between Llamas Ruiz’s stronger ranking, his straight-sets opening win and the market assessment. Nesterov’s three local wins and the absence of head-to-head evidence prevent a High rating, while the ranking advantage and recent result provide enough support to avoid Low.
This prediction expresses statistical probability, not certainty. Odds shown are an estimate for illustration only, not a live bookmaker price. SharpTips does not accept bets. 18+. Please gamble responsibly.
Recommended predictions
The strongest picks we have published for the coming matches.
Why bettors use SharpTips
Every pick is timestamped at least 12 hours before the match and never edited afterwards.
Wins and losses are settled automatically from the final score and stay public.
Form, league table, season statistics, injuries and line-ups for each match.
Bookmaker prices are the baseline - we look for concrete reasons to side with or against them.
Selections are written in full, exactly as they appear on a betting slip.
No pick is forced onto a fixture - where the data is thin we publish nothing.









